Chapter 6
Building the Audience
Rachel's Deadline
The email comes in at 1:52, eight minutes before the call.
Marcus, so sorry, something blew up here overnight and my whole day just went. Can we push? I still want to have this conversation. K
He reads it four times looking for the part that means no. It isn't there. It also isn't a date.
He writes back, short and gracious, and offers three windows. At two he sits in an empty office with the thirty minutes he cleared and nothing to put in them.
By the end of the day she hasn't picked one.
Rachel's check-in goes no better. She studies the engagement numbers for a while.
"These are interesting," she says. "When does interesting turn into a number I can put in a spreadsheet?"
He tells her Karen Walsh pushed the call and hasn't picked a new date.
Rachel's ninety days are almost up.
The numbers, meanwhile, are excellent.
Followers past seven hundred. Engagement up every week since he stopped polishing every post. Comments from people whose titles he'd have paid to get on the phone in January. He can watch the graph go up, and it has become the only part of the day that reliably feels like progress.
By Monday night he's been on LinkedIn for three hours. He answers every comment, leaves comments on other people's posts, and reads the feed for what's moving, so tomorrow's post answers what people are already talking about.
The writing isn't the problem. It got cheap two weeks ago and stayed cheap. The hours go to the comments and the feed.
David catches him on the way out.
"The API integration spec."
"I know."
"You've been getting to it for two weeks. I'm not nagging, I'm blocked." David stops in the doorway. "Also, you look terrible."
His phone buzzes at 10:10. Tom.
"Coffee. I can hear you burning out from here."
Marcus types back: Wednesday. Same place.
What Are You Optimizing For
Same coffee shop, Wednesday. Tom looks rested. Marcus looks like he hasn't slept.
"So," Tom says, before the coffee arrives. "What are you optimizing for?"
"Audience."
"Are you? Or are you just trying to look like you have one?"
Marcus doesn't answer.
"Here's what I can see from outside it," Tom says. "You're working harder than you were in January. In January you were cold calling, which is the worst job in the world. You look worse now."
"The numbers are up."
"Which numbers?"
"Followers. Engagement. Comments—"
"Right." Tom nods. "Now name one person who'd notice if you stopped."
Marcus opens his mouth.
He runs the list. Seven hundred and some followers. He can name the servicing manager in Boise who left the one comment worth having. He can name Karen Walsh, who has not written back. Two people in DMs who are pleasant and going nowhere.
He gets to four. He is fairly sure about three of them.
"That's the difference," Tom says. "Followers are people who see your posts. An audience is the people who'd notice if you stopped. They're the ones who buy."
Tom turns his cup. "Followers aren't worthless. They come after you have an audience. And I'd let you keep working on it another month if this were 2019, because back then a big following was at least evidence you'd done something hard. Now everyone posts every day, and a lot of it is written by a model. It costs nothing." He shrugs. "You've seen your feed. You're in it every night."
He sets the cup down. "So go deeper instead of wider. When everybody can post every day, people keep coming back only to the ones they've decided to trust."
Marcus writes that down.
"The trust comes from what you know," Tom says. "You spent February building that, in the spark file. Without it you're just posting on a schedule."
"I have until next Friday."
"And you're spending three hours a night on comments and the feed."
The Engagement Hierarchy
Tom's question is the test. The people who would ask where you went if you disappeared for a month are your audience. Everyone else is a follower.
An audience grows through four rungs. Many people stall on the first rung.¹
Broadcast. Publish and hope. You have to do it, and it isn't enough.
Respond. Somebody comments, and you answer like a person. Not thanks! Add something, ask something, or disagree. This is where a reader stops being a number and becomes someone you know by name.
Initiate. Go to them. Comment on other people's work with something worth reading. Send a message that isn't a pitch and isn't a setup for one. Few people do this. Nothing visible happens today, and it feels awkward to write to a stranger when you have nothing to sell.
Connect. Introduce two people who should know each other. Both remember who did it, and over time people start bringing things to you first.
Software can already automate most of these rungs. It can broadcast and you cannot tell. It can reply and you can sometimes tell. It can send a message that is not technically a pitch, and you can usually tell, because nothing is at stake for the sender.
Two more moves go with the rungs.
Go deep on one platform. Pick the one your buyers already use and stay there. Spreading your attention across three leaves you forgettable on all three. Publishing is free now, so a thin presence everywhere looks the same as an automated one. Depth in one place is hard to automate, so it still reads as a person.
Then get them off the platform. A following on someone else's network is rented, and the platform can change the terms whenever it wants. That was always true. Now everybody posts every day, so fewer people see any one post. If you built everything there, you lose the most. An email list is a channel the platform does not control. Inboxes are flooded too, so the same rule applies there: the list is worth something only if the mail is worth opening.
Survival
A few days before Rachel's decision, on a Monday, Marcus opens the five beta lenders' usage data for the first time since February. He is looking for something else and finds a pattern. The borrowers who leave don't scatter. Most end up with the same few lenders, and they leave within weeks of a rate move, not months.
He takes it to the servicing manager in Boise, in a DM with no ask in it.
The reply is short, and Marcus reads it twice.
They're not waiting for those borrowers to shop. They buy the trigger lead the day the credit gets pulled. Your borrower gets a call from someone who already knows they're looking, and they know it before you do.
A trigger lead is a notice that a borrower's credit was just checked for a new loan. Any lender willing to pay for it can call that borrower the same day.²
Marcus sits with that most of a day. Then he writes four short paragraphs.
Retention gets sold as lifetime value. I think that's the wrong frame, and it's why retention doesn't get funded.
A borrower you lose becomes somebody else's proof that it's easier over there. And they tell the people who trust them.
Meanwhile the lenders taking them aren't waiting for the shopping to start. They buy the trigger lead the day the credit is pulled.
If you're a traditional lender, a company that has never talked to your borrower can still take them.
It goes up on a Tuesday.
Two hundred and forty-seven likes. Thirty-one comments. People tagging colleagues, which he has never seen happen to anything of his. Followers pass a thousand.
The graph jumps more in two days than it did in the two weeks before. He barely looks at it.
What he watches now is the email list. Three of the comment threads turn into people asking whether he's written this up anywhere. He hasn't, beyond the plain PDF, Five Questions to Assess Your Client Retention Strategy, so he pins a comment under the post offering it to anyone who joins his email list, with the signup link. By Thursday the list has gone from fifty-two to eighty-one. He can write to those twenty-nine readers directly, whatever LinkedIn does.
He's reading the thread that evening when one comment stops him.
Mike Donovan. SVP, Sales Operations. First National Mortgage.
First National is a top-ten lender. It does not answer cold email, it runs a procurement process, and one contract there could be the reason VaultPath still exists in two years.
"The trigger-lead point is the part nobody upstairs wants to hear. We've modeled it twice and shelved it twice. What's your read on why?"
Marcus's first instinct is a paragraph about VaultPath. He gets three sentences in before he hears Tom and deletes it.
What he sends instead: "My read is that nobody owns the problem. Retention sits between marketing and servicing, and neither one funds it. Is that what happened at First National, or was it something else? I also have a short assessment that shows whether a lender can see this in its own data, if it would be useful."
He hits send before he can soften it.
Mike answers in under two hours. It runs four paragraphs, none of them about software.
Ninety Days
The call with Rachel is on Friday, the ninetieth day.
"I don't have a signed contract," he says. "The five beta lenders are unpaid pilots, so they don't count. I want to say that before you ask, so we don't spend ten minutes working up to it."
"All right." Her face gives away nothing.
"Here's what I do have." He goes through it plainly. Karen Walsh, a VP of Sales at a two-hundred-officer lender, found him and is still in the thread after pushing the call. Mike Donovan, SVP at First National, wrote four paragraphs about his own problem to a man he has never met. Two mid-size conversations are real and slow. The email list is at eighty-one, up from fifty-two in the days since the post. Followers have gone from seven hundred and some to a little over a thousand. He mentions that last and briefly.
"Ninety days ago you asked for pipeline and qualified opportunities. I have the beginning of both, and I got them by being findable instead of by chasing. I couldn't have bought that in January."
Rachel is quiet for a while.
"You know what I noticed? You didn't lead with the followers. In January you led with the roadmap."
"That's fair."
"That's not praise. I'm checking whether you learned anything." She takes off her glasses. In January that was a bad sign. Today she is just thinking. "First National coming to you after reading a post is the only item on that list I couldn't have gotten from a competent consultant."
"So."
"So I'm not shutting the company down today."
She waits a second. "But I'm changing the ask. Ninety more days, and at the end I don't want pipeline. Pipeline is a forecast, and you're good at those. I want a signature. One. Any size."
"That's harder."
"It is." She ends the call.
He opens the thread with Karen Walsh, unanswered for two weeks, and writes the shortest thing he's written in a month.
"No pressure on timing. But I've learned something since we last wrote that's actually about your problem. Twenty minutes whenever the fire's out."
She writes back in forty minutes, offering three times on Tuesday.
Later, walking to the car, he remembers the question Tom asked him in the coffee shop in February: was he fascinated by mortgage client retention, or just panicking? Tom told him to ask again once Rachel had decided. She has, and the deadline Tom meant is behind him.
He is still thinking about trigger leads. If lenders are buying the notice the day a credit report is pulled, somebody is selling it, and he doesn't know what it costs.
He gets in the car, leaves the engine off, and looks up how trigger leads are priced.
Endnotes
-
The ladder in the teaching section, and phrases such as "many people stall on the first rung" and "fewer people see any one post," are my judgment from working in lead generation and marketing, not findings from a study.
-
Trigger leads are real and are standard practice in mortgage lending. A reader who wants a source can look up the practice by name.
The specifics of what Marcus's beta lenders can see in their own data are invented, along with Marcus, his followers, and the timing of Rachel's decision.